BSR! Roundtable: Quantum of Solace

Swank-mo-tron: Hello everyone, Swank-mo-tron here.  I just wanted to kick off our first roundtable in a while, this time for the new 007 picture, Quantum of Solace.

Let me be the first to say that this movie was pretty good despite obvious mistakes and missteps.  The action sequences, though too choppy, were pretty engaging and cool and Daniel Craig is a certifiable bad-ass.  Having said that, this isn’t my favorite Bond film and there are a few reasons for that.  First, the fact that Forster decided to NOT open with the gun barrel sequence that every other James Bond picture opens with started off this outing with a bit of annoyance for me.  (I was already pissed because there wasn’t a Watchmen trailer on my print but two (count ’em two!) fucking Seven Pounds trailers).  The lack of the gun barrel combined with the utterly patronizing and pointless title screens every time the locale changes served to grate on me through what should have been an otherwise perfect film.  I mean, how many Bond movies have we as a collective audience sat through and didn’t need updates about where the action was heading and all of a sudden we’re too fucking stupid?  I mean honestly, when Bond says, “They’re going to Bolivia,” and they get on a plane and the next shot is him getting off, can’t we just assume that we’re in Bolivia instead of taking me for a moron?  My other big problem was the lack of 007’s theme song in the body of the film.  In Casino Royale, I understood the reason they held off, but for this outing there was no excuse.

Also, where the fuck are Q and Moneypenny?  There is a reason that for 20 straight Bond films there was a Q department and a great scene with Bond and his relationship with Moneypenny.  Why are we not capable of handling that awesomeness anymore?  The next film might as well be Moonraker bad if it can’t include Moneypenny, Q, the James Bond theme and the gun barrel sequence at the fucking beginning.  Otherwise this is just another Bourne movie, and I’ve had enough of those….

Any thoughts?

Humanjunk: The movie was good though. I won’t say it’s as good as Casino Royale, as I seemed to miss the character arc if there was any for Bond. He spent the whole of the movie scowling and being emotionally constipated, don’t get me wrong, Daniel Craig is a fine Bond, by far my favorite, but it seemed to me that he spent the entire time pissed over Vesper. This movie and the last one are more human and real than any of the other ones in the franchise, and Craig, though brooding, brings an element of melancholy to the film; a man who fights against his emotions, fearing that they’ll make him seem weak. He’s well aware that everything he touches turns to shit.

I’m all about not following the formula of a franchise that became an inflated caricature of itself with Bond being a two dimensional, womanizing piece of misogynistic Eurotrash with absurd gadgets like invisible cars. Because of that I could give a shit about Q and Moneypenny being in the flick. No need to force characters in a story just because it’s part of the franchise. Bond and M are enough for me.  Sadly this film did follow some of the said formulas, immediately after the opening credits (one of the worst Bond theme’s next to Madonna’s Die Another Day) we get a little exposition and then BOOM! another chase. It’s easy to get lost in all the action scenes, they’re fun, Craig can take a fucking hit like a champ, but, some felt obligatory and could have easily been substituted with more development and exposition. I’d be willing to sacrifice a half hour more of my movie experience to have some more dialogue and not just some shoot outs and chases. The ending felt a little anti climactic and spent the entire time wondering “Bond’s a trained, lethal killer who has in the past 2 hours beat the shit out of trained soldiers, body guards and goons, so why the fuck is he not just beating the living shit out of this nerdy, terrorist in an environmentalists skin?
Dr. Cyborg Robot M.D. Attorney at Law – Five: I am admittedly not a huge Bond fan, I haven’t seen many of the older movies, but I do think that Daniel Craig is an excellent Bond. I think that Casino Royale is easily my favorite Bond flick to date, but I find it densely flawed. I think this one was even more flawed, but somehow entertaining. It may have been the lack of sex or spirituality in the film, but more likely the over use of chase scenes. Replacing one chase scene with a single boob, or even a ghost could have saved this movie.

If this movie were a roller coaster I would call it “Bad Movie!”-Slugtron

Swank-mo-tron: I decided to go catch it again, and I have to say that I enjoyed it more the second time because I was able to ignore the stupid shit that bugged me the first time.  Having said that, I’ve rewatched a few of the other Bond films and I have to say that they do, in fact, need Q and Moneypenny.  And maybe a gadget or two.  Otherwise, what makes this James Bond?  And the music.  Jesus, they need some fucking Bond music throughout…