Tag Archives: Movies

Amazing Spider-Man 2: Possible MJ Casting

According to Variety, Shailene Woodley is in early talks to play the second love of Peter Parker’s life, Mary Jane Watson. If this ends up being true, having MJ in the second film could introduce a lot of interesting avenues for the second film. I imagine she would be more of a background character, rather than creating a love triangle. Possibly she could pick up the pieces if the inevitable does occur for Gwen on the big screen.

Some rumors are also buzzing around possible villains for this second film. Variety stated that, “lightning features prominently in the [after credits] scene.” This statement hinting at Electro for the villain. If I am completely honest, I do not remember ANY lightning. I feel strongly that this series will stick closer to the animal villains from Spider-Man’s rogue gallery. Such as Rhino and Scorpion. With Oscorpe and how it has been trying to utilize mother nature to it’s advantage, Electro would feel really out of place.

Of course, I could be wrong. What do you think of the MJ casting news? Any villains you’d like to see on the big screen?

TRAILER: 007 – Skyfall

IGN got a new Skyfall trailer, replete with Adele’s new title track for the film. It’s a great song and much more worthy of being in the Bond mythos than some of the songs we’ve had. (I mean, really, have you listened to the song for Octopussy? It sucks worse than Octopussy, which is saying something…)

Skyfall comes out next month and be sure to watch this space as we’ll be leading up to it with a Bond retrospective.

HORROR MOVIE REVUE: Psycho

I’m not the biggest fan of Horror movies and it’s rare that a movie terrifies me once, let alone over repeated viewings. One of those prestigious films on my short list is Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho.

This was the first Hitchcock film I watched as a kid. I saw it on video (maybe it was on TV) when I was about 10 years old and it scared the hell out of me. It has never ceased scaring the hell out of me.

Psycho must be on any list of Halloween Horror movie viewing. It simply must be.

But you have to have the right mindset to watch it and enjoy it. I’ve been fortunate enough to catch it on the big screen a few times over the last few years and more than once I’ve been shocked by the reaction of the audience. Sure, this film is dated to the point where it looks like a period piece, and it’s made with storytelling techniques that are the foundation upon which all of modern thriller cinema is built upon. Audiences I’ve seen it with seem to have mistaken this film for a comedy and it drives me up the wall.

So, do yourself a favor and watch it in the proper setting.

Dim the lights on a dark, moonlit night. Watch it with your most squeamish friend. Even better if they haven’t seen it before.

Then, hit play.

Don’t pause the film, don’t turn it off for any reason and don’t say a word. Pay careful attention, investing yourself into the whole of the film. Back when the film was released, Hitchcock forced movie theatres to enforce rules for watching the film. There were lobby cards outside theatres playing the film reading:

We won’t allow you to cheat yourself. You must see PSYCHO from the very beginning. Therefore, do not expect to be admitted into the theatre after the start of each performance of the picture. We say no one — and we mean no one — not even the manager’s brother, the President of the United States, or the Queen of England (God bless her)!

And I think that’s excellent advice even today.

It’s difficult to discuss the film, knowing that most people these days haven’t seen it. Do they know the secrets of the film? Do they know how carefully it builds? How well the murders play out? How well it turns on a dime, switching main characters at will, forcing you, and them, to constantly reevaluate the possibilities of what is going on.

Hitchcock knew the best way to promote the film was to give away no secrets and to tease curiosity. Here’s one of the original trailers for the film and I think it’s perfect:

Here’s a more modern trailer, cut by a fan, that does a better job of getting a modern audience hooked, but I think it shows a bit more than Hitchcock ever intended to someone who hasn’t seen the film. What it does showcase beautifully, however, is Bernard Herrmann’s haunting, all-strings score for the film.

The scariest movies, in my opinion, are ones where people are the monsters… And Psycho is one of the best at that.

It’s also one of the few, true horror films Hitchcock ever made. He was more into thrillers and this is truly the birth of the slasher genre.

If you’ve spent a lot of time watching slashers, you’ll recognize many techniques they use in films today in Psycho.

But my point is this: watch this investing everything into the story. Suspend your disbelief for the time period and the era in which it was made and you will have one of the most terrified movie-watching experiences of your life.

You can pick up the Blu-ray right now on Amazon.

And, under NO CIRCUMSTANCES, are you to EVER watch Gus Van Sant’s remake. Ever. It’s a horrible piece of filth and needs to die in a fire.

TRAILER: The Lone Ranger

“In the early days of the western United States, a masked man and an Indian rode the plains, searching for truth and justice. Return with us now to those thrilling days of yesteryear, when from out of the past come the thundering hoofbeats of the great horse Silver! The Lone Ranger rides again!”

It’s been hinted at for a while and oft-delayed due to budget concerns, but tonight Disney finally unveiled the first trailer for the upcoming (Summer 2013) Lone Ranger movie. Truth be told, there is not to much to glean from this early teaser. You do get too see some footage and a voice-over from Johnny Depp as Tonto. Surprisingly  there are only a couple of scenes with either him or Armie Hammer as the Lone Ranger. If I were to base this movie on this teaser, it’d actually look like the train is the star!

Seriously though, I’ve always been a fan of the Ranger, and as long as Disney and director Gore Verbinski keep true to the Ranger’s code, it should be pretty enjoyable. I’m kind of holding out hope that the last scene will take place in the 30’s where the Lone Ranger’s son Dan Reid is relating the tale to his son Britt, who is then inspired to be the Green Hornet, but that’s just my fanboyishness coming through. At any rate, it’ll probably be better than Cowboys Vs. Aliens!

“>httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz0PUiPexVQ

HORROR MOVIE REVUE: Cape Fear (1991)

Some might argue Cape Fear is not really a horror movie but to that I would contend that a religious zealot hell bent on destroying your life and everyone you associate with is just as scary if not more so then monsters and ghosts. Zealots are scary as it is but then give them a reason to kill you and have it be within their self designed rights and you have someone who will not stop until “justice” has been served.

I had never watched Cape Fear before today but one of my favorite episodes of The Simpsons was the Cape Feare episode in the fifth season which heavily parodies this movie. There were many iconic moments which I knew immediately because of The Simpsons. They even used the same music. I hadn’t realized how strongly they had parodied it until watching it now and I found myself anticipating each moment from the episode.

(Spoilers to follow)

So in that way I was spoiled to some of the more iconic moments but that didn’t make the movie any less creepy or shocking. Some of the more disturbing moments were not put into The Simpsons episode for obvious reasons, so moments such as Cady being lighted in Kerosene were exciting and terrifying and Cady being dressed as the maid, I did not see that coming at all.

(Spoilers ended)

I’m not much of a horror guy, I was exposed to one scene in “It” when I was young and it soured me to the entire joy of being scared. So thrillers such as this are in more of my alley then most other Horror. So for those who might want something thrilling but not something typically horror this is a good one to go back and watch. Plus it is directed by Martin Scorsese.

HORROR MOVIE REVUE: A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

For me, Freddy Krueger will always be the king of the 80s’ serialized, supernatural horror movie killers. Michael Meyers and Jason Voorhees never really did it for me. They just pale in comparison to a guy who kills you in your dreams. So it seems only appropriate to kick off this Horror Movie Revue with Wes Craven’s Freddy Krueger, the Nightmare on Elm Street.

The original A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) suffers from the same issues that many of the old horror movies do. Namely: the technology just wasn’t there for the directors to really pull off their vision, so when we look back on them they seem more comical than horrifying. This is okay with me, because I love old “awesome-terrible” horror movies. If you’re with me on that, and you haven’t checked out Mr. Krueger, you should do yourself a favor and get on that this October. Also, you get to see a fresh faced young Johnny Depp in his very first feature film role get (minor spoiler alert) turned into a fountain of gravity-defying blood.

As far as character creation goes, Freddy Krueger is actually pretty brilliant. A supernatural killer with power over the dream world offers up nearly endless sequel possibilities. Especially since, being a dream figure, Freddy not only represents but can also tap into the subconscious fears of his victims. This allows for a lot of variation, and a lot of really creative scenes. One of the most disappointing things about the early Elm Street movies is that they don’t play on these possibilities quite enough. For example in the original, there is a scene where primary protagonist Nancy tries to run up a flight of stairs, only to have the stairs turn into a sticky goo beneath her feet. It would have been nice if there was more of this classic, dream-like stuff. But again: time, financial, and technological restrictions need to be taken into account.

Since all (or most) of the big kills happen inside the dream world, you can easily explain away the characters’ illogical actions with the phrase “dream logic.” This is one of the most convenient things about the Elm Street concept, and alleviates an issue that often causes people to shout at their televisions when they’re watching horror movies. Instead of saying something like, “Why the hell would she go into that basement instead of running like crazy?” we intuitively understand that being in a dream makes you do illogical things sometimes.

Freddy is your classic grinning-sadist archetype, and he loves to toy with his prey. Particularly by playing on their deepest fears. These games become more elaborate and interesting as the series progresses, but we still get a good sense for Freddy’s potential in the original. Primary among these is the film’s ability to make you question the reality of what is happening. False awakenings are common in the Elm Street movies, as well as characters not realizing they have fallen asleep until it’s too late–cue the spooky, synth-heavy 80s movie score. This toying with the boundary between real and imaginary is one of the most interesting ways in which the movie messes with you.

Revisiting one of my old horror favorites yesterday turned into a mini marathon. And if you haven’t run through the Elm Street movies before, I cannot stress enough that you should pretend A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985) doesn’t exist, and never happened. It is absolutely terrible in almost every way. Primary among my complaints: Freddy doesn’t act like Freddy. They tried to turn him into some kind of generic poltergeist instead of the horrifying dream-world killer he is. (Wes Craven had nothing to do with the second installment, and you can feel the influence of producers who had no idea why the original one was so awesome.) I could go off on all the reasons I despised this movie, but instead I’ll just suggest that you give it a pass and go straight to A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: The Dream Warriors (1987). Wherein Freddy gets back to doing what Freddy does best: murdering the hell out of adolescents in psychologically upsetting and creative ways in their dreams.

Oh, and one more thing: do yourself a favor and don’t ever watch the 2010 remake. It is terrible. (Big shocker: Michael Bay was one of the remake’s producers.)

In any case, it’s October, go watch a horror movie already! And if you’re not sure which one to pick up then keep an eye on the BigShinyRobot article feed this month, because we’ll be bringing you our take on a ton of horror classics over the coming weeks.

TRAILER: Argo

I know the trailer has been out for a while, but it’s hyper-relevant to geeks. Aside from being directed by Superman and Daredevil himself, Ben Affleck, it tells a tale close to the hearts of geeks every where, for Jack Kirby plays a central part in it.

He’s being played by Michael Parks in this film (who you’ll remember as the bad guy in Red State.) You see, when they needed a cover for their movie, they needed a whole bunch of designs and sets drawn up and they turned to the King.

It’s quite a fascinating story and I can’t wait to see what Affleck has done with it.

TRAILER: Peter Pan – Blu-ray

Peter Pan is one of my favorite of the Disney movies. Everything about it brings a smile to my face. And every time I hit a Disney park I HAVE to go on the Peter Pan ride. (It’s amazing how much better the ride is at DisneyLand as compared to Disney World.)

You can sign up through Amazon to pre-order the Blu-ray.

This is one I’m definitely picking up.

REVIEW: DREDD 3D (plus interviews with Karl Urban and Alex Garland!)

I hope none of you remember the mid-to-late ’90s, when after The Crow was a success at the box office, studios tried to adapt other gritty comics like Spawn into films– with disastrous results. (Thank God we never got a Sandman movie, right?) One of those movies was Judge Dredd, starring Sylvester Stallone and Rob Schneider, a film which bore as little resemblance to its source material as 2005’s Elektra did to Frank Miller’s comics.

Everything that “film” got wrong, this one gets right.  First? The premise. Filmmaker Alex Garland (28 Days Later) keeps the post-apocalyptic and gritty, urban setting of Mega City One. We skip the origin story so many films feel they need to tell, and instead we’re put right into the middle of the action: Judge Dredd, amazingly well-played by Karl Urban (Star Trek, Doom, Lord of the Rings) one of hundreds of judges who act as police, judge, jury, and executioner to keep the law, chasing down a team of bad guys escaping from a crime. We see Dredd in action, and it is a sight to behold. We’re also introduced to a new drug the baddies are using, “Slo-Mo,” a hallucinogenic that is somewhere between Ecstasy, LSD, and. . . something that makes everything feel like it’s in slow motion. After Dredd has done his job, we’re introduced to rookie Anderson (Olivia Thirlby), whom Dredd is tasked with assessing in the field. Despite her low aptitude scores, she has latent psychic abilities, which the Chief Judge wants asessed to see if she is a liability or not. Luckily, explaining that the iconic helmets interfere with her psychic abilities, Thirlby never wears one. Urban, however, never takes his off– a point that he explained to me was stipulated in his contract. Alex Garland, coincidentally, had independently written the same thing into his contract.

So, placed in this “Training Day” sort of situation, Dredd and Anderson go to investigate what appears to be a simple case: three homicides in the Peach Trees, a slum where thousands of families live in dilapidated tenements in one giant concrete building over 200 stories tall. At first, this appears to be a simple gang turf war gone wrong, until the cops are clued in to the fact that only one gang controls the building, led by an ex-prostitute turned druglord named “Ma Ma”, played with utter glee and abandon by Lena Headley (Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles, 300). Dredd and Anderson then find themselves in outgunned, outnumbered and in over their heads as they’re forced to fight their way up the complex The Raid: Redeption style.

Let me point out that while there are obvious comparisons between Dredd, Raid, and even Attack the Block, it’s not fair to say, as I heard some of the film hipsters here at FantasticFest whine, that they “ripped off” the concept. That is utter bull$#!t, as Dredd started production long before those other films ever came out. What it is a sign of, however, is three great filmmakers each pulling something out of the zeitgeist to create films with similar milieus and to all come out as great fun.

This film gets so much else right. As I referred to earlier, the performances by all of the leads are top notch. I asked Urban about his process, how do you act with having half of your face obscured the entire time? “The voice became very important, as did the physicality of the character… We had a lot of discussions with Alex. We decided it would be a mistake to try to play the icon, what we needed to find was the man. We focused on the physicality of the character, the sense of humor, finding out where he’s compassionate, where the gear-shifts are.” Thirlby throughout the film has the most dramatic of the character arcs, where you can see her as she grows throughout the film. And then Headley, as I mentioned, brings a pathos and a lot of depth to a character that otherwise might have been just a one-dimensional psychopath. Garland in his conversation with us mentioned that this was a truly independent film that was independently financed and therefore, very low budget (don’t believe the numbers you read on the internet, folks– he implied, though never directly stated, that this number was incredibly inflated, but directly said that it was false). This low budget indie vibe permeated everyone on set. Karl was there not for a paycheck, but because he grew up as a kid working in a pizza parlor reading Dredd comics. Alex wrote it because Dredd was his favorite comic, and, he admitted, one of the first things he ever hid from his parents. You can see that camaraderie and craft that went into the filmmaking. This is, quite simply, the best acted action/sci-fi film we’ve had in a while. The only other contender I can even compare it to is the work by Idris Elba, Charlize Theron, and Michael Fassbender in Prometheus.

And then possibly the most important thing they got right in the film were the visual effects. I was extremely skeptical coming into the movie. “Oh great. It’s in 3D. And it’s got super-slow-motion shots. Great.” I was expecting a ho-hum reboot more along the lines of Total Recall than what I got, which was absolutely spectacular. The film shot mostly on practical sets, and they saved the digital special effects for when we see what happens when someone is under the effects of Slo-Mo. I have to say, I’ve never done a drug in my life. But Slo-Mo looks like a lot of fun. As we, the audience, experience the Slo-Mo drug, everything turns sparkly and rainbow-y and beautiful. It’s easy to get lost in. And the 3D is used to great effect to help give a sense of scale, and even vertigo, from looking down the center of the huge 200-story Peach Trees complex. There are some truly terrifying moments, at least for me as someone who is incredibly scared of heights, which only a 3D movie could help bring about. I asked Alex Garland if there was anything he couldn’t do with the film that he wanted to, and he said that it was so important to him to get the effects pieces right that they had to scale back on some practical set pieces, like he would’ve liked some more futuristic cars on the road instead of  just 1970s Toyotas. But that investment paid off, for me at least, and I didn’t miss seeing futuristic cars. It’s also ultra-violent. During so many of the action sequences where people are under the effects of the Slo-Mo, we see people shot through the face, blown up, and impacts after falling 200 stories. So, for the faint of heart, look away during some of those parts. There’s also implied violent sex and rape (implied, but still) so this film really packs a violent punch. So much of the ultra-violence seems played up for camp, though, so it’s simply Tarantino/Rodriguez-esque that’s played up for laughs. So, again, while 3D and super slow motion are usually hackneyed and unnecessary, I highly recommend seeing this movie in a 3D format, on the biggest screen you can with the best speakers you can find.

Which brings me to the soundtrack, which perfectly fits the apocalyptic gritty future. It’s a lot of break beats and industrial music, which reminded me of other films like the first Matrix or Blade 2.

This movie is a lot of fun. Go see it, because the filmmakers deserve your dollars. And especially if you want to see a sequel, which Urban and Garland say they’re game for. But if not, they call this “an instant cult classic” (it is) and a film that stands on its own as a tribute to the great work done through the years by John Wagner, the creator of the Judge Dredd comics.

Go see this.

3 1/2 stars

Super-secret inviso-text for people wondering about Star Trek:

Oh, also, I asked Karl about Star Trek. He promised that all will be revealed in May and we should be excited. As for previous things he said about Benedict Cumberbatch playing Gary Marshall, I get the feeling he’s f@#$ing with the fanboys on the internet.Although it may be more possible that he’s playing Gary Seven, which was who I asked about, and he blithely confimed that rumor. Again, just think he’s messing with us. 

TRAILER: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

This trailer looks amazing.

There’s really not much else to say. Peter Jackson really knows this world as well as any filmmaker can. And correct me if I’m wrong, but we got glimpses of Bjorn in this trailer, right? And was that Tom Bombadil? Or am I just imagining things.

I could be.

This film comes out in December. Then, we’ll have another year for the second, then 6 more months for the third.